Re: Repeated Query is much slower in PostgreSQL8.2.4 than DB2 9.1

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, ning <mailxiening(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Repeated Query is much slower in PostgreSQL8.2.4 than DB2 9.1
Date: 2009-07-15 22:51:54
Message-ID: 200907160051.55070.andres@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wednesday 15 July 2009 10:27:50 Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 12:10 +0900, ning wrote:
> > First execution: PostgreSQL 0.006277 seconds / DB2 0.009028 seconds
> > Second execution: PostgreSQL 0.005932 seconds / DB2 0.000332 seconds
>
> Actually, on second thoughts that looks a lot like DB2 is caching the
> query results and is just returning the cached results when you repeat
> the query.
Are you sure getting the query *result* is causing the delay? If my faint
memory serves right DB2 does plan caching - PG does not.
To test this theory you could prepare it and execute it twice.

Prepare it:
PREPARE test_query AS SELECT void,nameId,tag FROM (SELECT void,nameId,tag,....
FROM Attr
WHERE attributeof IN (SELECT oid_ FROM ItemView WHERE
ItemView.ItemId=?)) x RIGHT OUTER JOIN (SELECT oid_ FROM ItemView
WHERE ItemView.ItemId=? and ItemView.assignedTo_=?) y ON attributeof =
oid_ FOR READ ONLY;

Execute it:
EXECUTE test_query;
EXECUTE test_query;

Greetings,

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devin Ben-Hur 2009-07-15 23:56:37 Re: Very big insert/join performance problem (bacula)
Previous Message Mike Ivanov 2009-07-15 22:37:56 Re: Repeated Query is much slower in PostgreSQL8.2.4 than DB2 9.1