| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Document geqo_seed variable. |
| Date: | 2009-07-15 17:13:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200907151913.37041.andres@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 15 July 2009 19:01:05 Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Bernd Helmle<mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:
> > --On 15. Juli 2009 08:06:48 +0200 Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
wrote:
> >> It should not create multiple threads I think as all messages were a
> >> response the first mail?
> > It does (at least my MUA understood that correctly), but since many
> > people are reading in a "backlog"-style manner, i have to agree with
> > Robert. It makes it a little bit harder to track all changes which are
> > intended by a specific discussion.
For me its easier, as the different discussions are kept separate...
> Gmail starts a new thread if the subject line is changed, but I'm not
> going to hold the entire world hostage to my preferred email client.
> There are other problems, too, like if I want to apply this patch I
> have to download multiple emails to do it, and multiple links have to
> be added to the CommitFest app to reference the different parts.
Referencing the top Mail seems enough for me. To apply patches from mail I
have setup a filter which can apply an mbox directly...
But as patches I send are not intended to be consumed by me, I will stop
sending patches like that ;-)
Andres
PS: Gmail is a strange beast.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Böszörményi Zoltán | 2009-07-15 17:17:17 | Split-up ECPG patches |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-15 17:01:05 | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Document geqo_seed variable. |