| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jamie Fox <jfox(at)directcommerce(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator |
| Date: | 2009-07-13 22:35:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20090713223545.GP4930@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jamie Fox wrote:
> > I can also see that the pg_largeobject table is different, in the pg_restore
> > version the Rows (estimated) is 316286 and Rows (counted) is the same, in
> > the pg_migrator version the Rows (counted) is only 180507.
> Wow, I didn't test large objects specifically, and I am confused why
> there would be a count discrepancy. I will need to do some research
> unless someone else can guess about the cause.
Maybe pg_largeobject is not getting frozen?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-07-13 22:38:13 | Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-07-13 22:30:17 | Re: pg_migrator not setting values of sequences? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-07-13 22:38:13 | Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-07-13 22:30:17 | Re: pg_migrator not setting values of sequences? |