| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Start With... Connect By? |
| Date: | 2009-07-13 14:32:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20090713143220.GA14800@fetter.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 08:23:56AM +0200, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Philippe Lang, 13.07.2009 08:05:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now that Postgresql 8.4 has a "WITH RECURSIVE" operator (thanks!
>> :)), is there a chance we can see one day "START WITH... CONNECT
>> BY" in Postgresql, or is that something 100% oracle-specific?
>
> START WITH is Oracle specific whereas recursive CTEs are an ANSI
> Standard (supported by PostgreSQL, Firebird and SQL Server).
Not to mention DB2. I'm not sure how close Firebird is to actually
shipping them...
> As far as I can tell anything you can do with CONNECT BY can be done
> with WITH RECURSIVE (including ORDER SIBLINGS BY), it's just a bit
> more "noise" because you need to write more stuff (I wish the ANSI
> standard had adopted the CONNECT BY, it's really very elegant)
I don't. Apart from any IP issues that may obtain, CONNECT BY gets
its "elegance" for simple queries at the cost of nightmarish
kludginess for queries not quite as simple. I have a book by a
current Oracle employee--Vadim Tropashko's SQL Design Patterns--that
bemoans the lack of availability of CTEs in Oracle.
Once you get used to CTEs, you'll wonder how you ever programmed in
SQL without them :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-07-13 14:40:50 | Re: uuid_hash declaration |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-13 14:06:56 | Re: Problem with Check Constraint in pg_restore |