| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Gould <mgould(at)intermodalsoftwaresolutions(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Request for features |
| Date: | 2009-07-13 13:42:08 |
| Message-ID: | 200907131342.n6DDg8b01308@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Michael Gould wrote:
> I would like to know what the formal method of requesting new features are
> for Postgres and how are decisions made which features are included in a
> future release or not.
Uh, you usually ask for the feature on the bugs or hackers email lists,
and if we consider it useful it will be added to the TODO list. Then,
someday, someone might implement your feature. Not very rigorous, but
that is the only method we have.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marek Lewczuk | 2009-07-13 13:48:40 | Re: SPI_ERROR_CONNECT within pl/pgsql, PG 8.4 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-13 13:33:49 | Re: SPI_ERROR_CONNECT within pl/pgsql, PG 8.4 |