| From: | Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: REINDEX "is not a btree" |
| Date: | 2009-07-10 15:12:04 |
| Message-ID: | 200907100812.04294@hal.medialogik.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Friday 10 July 2009, Vanessa Lopez <v(dot)lopez(at)open(dot)ac(dot)uk> wrote:
> What do you mean by we can't simply take a filesystem copy of a
> running database? :-O ... How should we then do the backups (so next
> time I will not have the same problem again) ?
There is extensive documentation on how to do backups. For filesystem
backups, see PITR.
You might also want to examine all your backup strategies - most running
applications are not happy about being backed up without taking special
steps to ensure data consistency.
--
Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world,
is either a madman or an economist.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-07-10 15:39:49 | Re: Checkpoint Tuning Question |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-10 15:09:52 | Re: REINDEX "is not a btree" |