Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation
Date: 2009-07-08 06:35:20
Message-ID: 200907080935.21144.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday 03 July 2009 02:28:22 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I looked at that and the problem is that pg_migrator must be built
> against the _new_ source tree, and will issue an error and exit if it
> isn't. The problem with PGXS is it silently chooses the source tree to
> use based on which pg_config it finds in its path first; that seems
> error-prone. Any ideas for a clearer way to specify pg_config, and is
> that really helping things if the user has to specify it?

The standard way to do that is

make PG_CONFIG=/some/where/pg84/pg_config

> As you can
> see, pg_migrator has the requirement of running in a multi-pg_config
> binary environment, so it has extra complexity that might make pg_config
> an undesirable option to be promoted first.

It's certainly easier to do the above than having to download, configure, and
modify the PostgreSQL source tree, I think.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2009-07-08 07:37:12 Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2009-07-08 06:04:15 Re: Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby