| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: EDB taking over? |
| Date: | 2009-07-08 06:32:28 |
| Message-ID: | 200907080932.29731.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 21:38:06 Simon Riggs wrote:
> We should either
> i) remove it
> ii) auction/openly charge for the advertising space
> iii) have a credits or sponsors list
While I have occasionally spoken up about this, I'm not sure how to formulate
a fair set of rules that can apply to everyone.
The page in question is this: <http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux>. We
do promote an Ubuntu package there, for example. And even though Ubuntu
installers are not typically graphical, I don't think anyone would really
notice or complain if these packages printed out a notice, "Ubuntu packages
made by Canonical".
And then how is this different from "One-Click Installer made by
EnterpriseDB"?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2009-07-08 08:39:05 | Re: EDB taking over? |
| Previous Message | Joshua Kramer | 2009-07-08 02:26:48 | Re: I can't think of a punch line but... |