From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: ALTER SET DISTINCT vs. Oracle-like DBMS_STATS |
Date: | 2009-07-06 15:36:03 |
Message-ID: | 20090706153603.GC5861@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Itagaki Takahiro escribió:
> It is just similar to Oracle's DBMS_STATS package.
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28419/d_stats.htm
> If it were, "ALTER TABLE tablename ALTER COLUMN 3rd-column SET DISITNCT 100"
> could be written as:
>
> INSERT INTO dbms_stats.columns(starelid, ataattnum, stadistinct)
> VALUES ('tablename'::regclass, 3, 100);
>
> Of course ALTER SET DISTINCT is easy-to-use, so it could be an alias for
> the above INSERT command.
Why wouldn't you implement this through reloptions? (I ask because the
syntax you propose above is awfully similar to what we used for
pg_autovacuum, which ended up being replaced by reloptions)
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-07-06 15:38:12 | Re: WIP: generalized index constraints |
Previous Message | Mike Rylander | 2009-07-06 15:25:35 | Re: tsvector extraction patch |