From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |
Date: | 2009-07-03 18:06:41 |
Message-ID: | 200907031406.42160.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Friday 03 July 2009 11:50:29 Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> The current URL seems to be
> >> http://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=2
> >> which is both opaque as can be and not looking like it's intended to
> >> be stable over the long term.
> >
> > I'm not sure why you would think that it's not stable.
>
> Because it's exposing three or four details of your implementation,
> which you might wish to change later.
>
> > I'm also not sure what you would think that it's not self-explanatory,
> > since it looks pretty self explanatory to me.
>
> It's impossible to know that this is commitfest 2009-07.
>
commitfest.postgresql.org/2009/07 ?
That, or any similar scheme, seems easily doable with a little apache rewrite
magic and some programming. See my blog urls for one such example.
--
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-07-03 18:10:51 | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |
Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2009-07-03 17:56:16 | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-07-03 18:10:51 | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |
Previous Message | nha | 2009-07-03 16:37:40 | Re: Group by on %like% |