| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.5 development schedule |
| Date: | 2009-07-02 02:31:56 |
| Message-ID: | 200907020231.n622Vua04186@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> > If we review patches as soon as they appear, and give rapid feedback, we
> > can easily reject patches that take more than a few days for the patch
> > author to resolve, and there would be little slippage; ?the same goes
> > for dealing with known bugs. ?I know it can be done, but I don't promise
> > it would be pleasant.
>
> Also agreed. It's never pleasant to have a patch rejected/postponed,
> but it's tolerable if you've gotten some feedback and understand the
> reasons why. Of course there is no guarantee that you will agree with
> those reasons, but that's life. Some day you may be the committer and
> have your turn to irritate patch submitters. :-)
Our only limitation is our own sense that we have been fair to patch
authors, i.e. there is no external restriction on how we handle things.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-07-02 02:32:28 | Re: 8.5 development schedule |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-02 02:29:58 | Re: HEAD is open for 8.5 development |