From: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier |
Date: | 2009-06-30 13:02:27 |
Message-ID: | 20090630130226.GB8417@yugib.highrise.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> [090630 00:18]:
> Perhaps tieing it to the schema is wrong and we should actually
> require the user to specify the template they want explicitly which
> would be even better for that. So it would be something like "WITH
> GRANTS LIKE sensitive_table".
And, not having any experience with the current permissions code, or the
code required to do that (;-]), I would *love* something like that...
*especially* if those grants remain "by reference", i.e. If I change the
GRANTS/REVOKES on sensitive_table, those are automatically "apply" to all
tables created with the "WITH GRANTS LIKE sensitive_table"...
It would simplify all the work I have to do in:
make_$PERMISSION_ROLE(table)
and make it much more "elegant", and save me having to re-run them all
if I want to change some permissions.
But I realize that since I'm as anal about my database schemas as I am
about my code, I'm probably not your typical "DB dev shop" people like
Josh are used to dealing with...
a.
--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-06-30 13:07:33 | Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-06-30 12:47:46 | Re: Hello to all postgresql developers :) |