From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Multi-Dimensional Histograms |
Date: | 2009-06-29 22:56:44 |
Message-ID: | 20090629225644.GJ21081@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 06:43:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:28:01PM -0700, Nathan Boley wrote:
> >> ... They dismiss singular value decomposition and the discrete
> >> wavelet transform as being too parametric ( which is silly, IMHO
> >> )
>
> > Should we have a separate discussion about eigenvalues? Wavelets?
>
> I think it'd be a short discussion: what will you do with
> non-numeric datatypes? We probably don't really want to assume
> anything stronger than that the datatype has a total ordering.
That sounds about like the discussion we needed unless we later decide
we need to do something special for approximations of R^n :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-06-29 23:16:24 | Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-29 22:49:54 | Re: Query progress indication - an implementation |