| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Stuck cvs lock on anoncvs repository |
| Date: | 2009-06-28 04:08:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20090628040853.GB23557@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Marc G. Fournier escribió:
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2009, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> Stefan Kaltenbrunner escribió:
>>> Greg Stark wrote:
>>>> do we not have --delete on the rsync command? why doesn't the problem
>>>> go away on the next sync if we do?
>>>
>>> we do use --delete - but nobody commited after we tagged and before the
>>> problem got reported so the regular on-commit code didn't kick in and
>>> forced syncs only happen once a day.
>>
>> Are we worried about bandwidth wastage that we don't run it more often?
>
> More often then when ppl commit? What would be the point to that?
Avoiding the precise problem that this thread is about, of course.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-06-28 08:19:25 | Re: Stuck cvs lock on anoncvs repository |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-28 02:09:59 | Re: Stuck cvs lock on anoncvs repository |