From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: security checks for largeobjects? |
Date: | 2009-06-22 15:22:27 |
Message-ID: | 20090622152227.GA4280@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:18:51PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Monday 22 June 2009 16:24:44 David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:00:10PM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > > KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > > > The todo list says, as follows:
> > > > * Binary Data
> > > > o Add security checks for large objects
> > > >
> > > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Binary_Data
> > > >
> > > > Is anyone working on? or interested in?
> > >
> > > OK, it seems to me nobody is working on the todo item.
> > > I'll also submit this feature on the v8.5 development cycle.
> >
> > This seems related to SQL/MED's file handling portion. Perhaps the
> > TODO should be merged into the SQL/MED one.
>
> MED is management of external data, whereas the large objects are internal,
> no?
It depends on your definition. The lo interface is pretty much to
objects on the file system directly.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-22 15:24:10 | Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression? |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-06-22 15:18:42 | Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression? |