Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen

From: Jeremy Kerr <jk(at)ozlabs(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeremy Kerr <jk(at)ozlabs(dot)org>, "<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen
Date: 2009-06-17 09:31:06
Message-ID: 200906171731.07149.jk@ozlabs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi all,

> Speaking of which, what about some performance numbers?

OK, benchmarks done:

http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/db/data/postgres.bcTruelen/

Summary: small increase in performance (~1-2% on my machine), at about
1.5 standard deviations from the mean. Profiles show a decent drop in
hits within bcTruelen.

However: Sysbench seems to be quite heavy with the fixed-width char
types, so may end up calling bcTruelen more than most workloads. Would
be nice to get some x86 numbers too, but I don't have a suitable machine
here.

So: The increase in performance is positive on this workload, albeit
fairly minor. Downside is increased code complexity.

Will re-send the patch once I work out how to get git to create a
context diff...

Cheers,

Jeremy

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Golub 2009-06-17 09:31:11 Named transaction
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2009-06-17 08:29:10 Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema