| From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Atul Chojar <achojar(at)airfacts(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Li <lilian(dot)ying(at)airfacts(dot)com>, Andy Yoder <ayoder(at)airfacts(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Different handling of PL/pgSQL for-loop variables in 8.3.7 vs. 8.2.7 ??? |
| Date: | 2009-06-11 11:00:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20090611110017.GA16553@depesz.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> generally - modification of cycle's control variable isn't good
> technique, because it's should be broken by some optimizations. When
i would argue then that these optimizations are broken, then.
> you would to modify this some variables, then use "while-loop"
> instead.
while technically possible, i find for loops much more straight forward,
and clearer to understand.
Best regards,
depesz
--
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/
jid/gtalk: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com / aim:depeszhdl / skype:depesz_hdl / gg:6749007
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-06-11 12:17:33 | Re: Different handling of PL/pgSQL for-loop variables in 8.3.7 vs. 8.2.7 ??? |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-06-11 10:45:56 | Re: Different handling of PL/pgSQL for-loop variables in 8.3.7 vs. 8.2.7 ??? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-06-11 11:10:47 | Re: queries on xmin |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-06-11 10:45:56 | Re: Different handling of PL/pgSQL for-loop variables in 8.3.7 vs. 8.2.7 ??? |