| From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Atul Chojar <achojar(at)airfacts(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Li <lilian(dot)ying(at)airfacts(dot)com>, 'Andy Yoder' <ayoder(at)airfacts(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Different handling of PL/pgSQL for-loop variables in 8.3.7 vs. 8.2.7 ??? |
| Date: | 2009-06-11 10:24:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20090611102441.GA12246@depesz.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:51:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's the new implementation. Depending on unspecified implementation
> details is a good way to have broken code.
i'm not sure if it's good change. there might be perfectly good reasons
to increment idx from within loop.
Best regards,
depesz
--
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/
jid/gtalk: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com / aim:depeszhdl / skype:depesz_hdl / gg:6749007
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-06-11 10:45:56 | Re: Different handling of PL/pgSQL for-loop variables in 8.3.7 vs. 8.2.7 ??? |
| Previous Message | Iñigo Martinez Lasala | 2009-06-11 08:47:09 | Re: Sobre Actualizacion |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matt Amos | 2009-06-11 10:25:49 | queries on xmin |
| Previous Message | Shakil Shaikh | 2009-06-11 10:07:59 | Re: Array Parameters in EXECUTE |