Re: to_timestamp error handling.

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Dhaval Jaiswal <dhaval(dot)jaiswal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: to_timestamp error handling.
Date: 2009-06-10 21:05:49
Message-ID: 200906110005.50810.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Wednesday 10 June 2009 18:02:45 Dhaval Jaiswal wrote:
> Yes, there isn't a use case for a month value outside 1-12, i found this
> due a typo.

What Would Oracle Do?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-10 21:25:00 Re: Re: patch to fix configure(.in) on openbsd wrt/ krb5/com_err and readline linking
Previous Message David Leppik 2009-06-10 18:17:43 Re: BUG #4849: intermittent future timestamps