From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgindent run coming |
Date: | 2009-06-10 03:36:53 |
Message-ID: | 200906100336.n5A3arp11645@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I saw a few odd things. Most importantly, it seems 'stat' was
> > introduced as a typedef on _both_ lists, yielding weird changes like:
>
> The standard headers do define "struct stat". I wonder whether the
> objdump kluge we are using is unable to distinguish typedef names
> from struct tags.
>
> > I will have to research this further tomorrow.
>
> We don't have a lot of time for research. Maybe the best thing is to
> just manually remove stat from the typedef list (along with anything
> else that clearly shouldn't be there)?
The problem is that there are other symbols I don't know about and the
diff is very large. I have found that the problem was caused when we
added Linux support to find_typedef and I have a way to get an accurate
list on my machine.
I will generate a proper list on my machine tomorrow then test Linux
here to see if I can get it to generate the right list too. But odds
are we are not going to have time to re-run the list on the build farm
even if I can get Linux working here.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-06-10 03:40:02 | Re: pgindent run coming |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-10 03:33:32 | Re: pgindent run coming |