| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Managing multiple branches in git |
| Date: | 2009-06-02 17:24:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20090602172414.GE5845@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Mielke wrote:
> I am curious about why an end user would really care? CVS and SVN both
> kept local workspace directories containing metadata. If anything, I
> find GIT the least intrusive of these three, as the .git is only in the
> top-level directory, whereas CVS and SVN like to pollute every directory.
That's not the problem. The problem is that it is kept in the same
directory as the checked out copy. It would be a lot more usable if it
was possible to store it elsewhere.
Yes, the .svn directories are a PITA.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2009-06-02 17:26:57 | Re: Managing multiple branches in git |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-06-02 17:18:46 | Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file |