From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up |
Date: | 2009-05-29 10:41:12 |
Message-ID: | 200905291341.12849.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 28 May 2009 20:03:38 Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> > Right. Shall we try to spec out exactly what our conversion
> > requirements are? Here's a shot:
>
> [...]
>
> > Comments? Other considerations?
>
> Certainly sounds reasonable to me. I'd be really suprised if that's
> really all that hard to accomplish. I'd be happy to help with some
> testing too if we feel that the current git repo is in reasonable shape
> to do that testing against (or someone has another).
Sounds like writing a comprehensive test suite against Tom's spec would be the
first step. And then this test suite can be run against various conversion
tools and configurations thereof.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sam Mason | 2009-05-29 11:31:49 | Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-05-29 10:38:49 | Re: search_path vs extensions |