Re: Problems with autovacuum

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Łukasz Jagiełło <lukasz(dot)jagiello(at)gforces(dot)pl>, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problems with autovacuum
Date: 2009-05-26 23:12:42
Message-ID: 20090526231242.GN32650@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Tom Lane escribió:

> Hmm, maybe we need to improve the code too. This example suggests that
> there needs to be some limit on the worker launch rate, even if there
> are so many databases that that means we don't meet naptime exactly.

We already have a 100ms lower bound on the sleep time (see
launcher_determine_sleep()). Maybe that needs to be increased?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-05-26 23:27:14 Re: Problems with autovacuum
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-05-26 23:00:34 Re: Hosted servers with good DB disk performance?