| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: problem with plural-forms |
| Date: | 2009-05-26 14:32:56 |
| Message-ID: | 200905261732.56706.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 17:19:50 Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > I think it should use the %2$s style specifier in that case. This
> > should work:
> >
> > printf (ngettext ("One file removed, containing %2$lu bytes",
> > "%d files removed, containing %lu bytes", n),
> > n, total_bytes);
>
> How's that gonna work? In the n=1 case, printf would have no idea about
> the type/size of the argument it would need to skip over.
gcc -Wall actually warns if you do this.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-05-26 14:34:32 | Re: problem with plural-forms |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-26 14:29:10 | Re: problem with plural-forms |