From: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: problem with plural-forms |
Date: | 2009-05-26 15:02:42 |
Message-ID: | 20090526150242.GD15213@yugib.highrise.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [090526 10:56]:
> Actually, configure checks to see if the local printf supports m$ or
> not, and we use our own printf implementation if not. So I'm not
> worried about #2. I agree with your other points though.
>
> (So, if you wanna see how this is done, try src/port/snprintf.c)
>
> regards, tom lane
So what part of a working libc does PG use that it *doesn't* have to
carry around in src/port/?
;-)
a.
--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tomas | 2009-05-26 15:03:55 | Re: generic options for explain |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-26 14:55:18 | Re: problem with plural-forms |