Re: problem with plural-forms

From: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: problem with plural-forms
Date: 2009-05-26 15:02:42
Message-ID: 20090526150242.GD15213@yugib.highrise.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [090526 10:56]:

> Actually, configure checks to see if the local printf supports m$ or
> not, and we use our own printf implementation if not. So I'm not
> worried about #2. I agree with your other points though.
>
> (So, if you wanna see how this is done, try src/port/snprintf.c)
>
> regards, tom lane

So what part of a working libc does PG use that it *doesn't* have to
carry around in src/port/?

;-)

a.

--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tomas 2009-05-26 15:03:55 Re: generic options for explain
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-05-26 14:55:18 Re: problem with plural-forms