Re: [PATCH] Automatic client certificate selection support for libpq v1

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Seth Robertson <in-pgsql-hackers(at)baka(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Automatic client certificate selection support for libpq v1
Date: 2009-05-11 07:53:08
Message-ID: 200905111053.08335.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday 08 May 2009 22:03:56 Tom Lane wrote:
> I hesitate though to suggest that we think about porting
> ourselves to NSS --- I'm not sure that there would be benefits to us
> within the context of Postgres alone.

That could be attractive if we ripped out the OpenSSL code at the same time,
as the NSS API is purportedly more abstract and presumably would reduce the
amount and the complexity of the code.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-05-11 07:59:54 Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2009-05-11 07:25:06 Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking