| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: windows shared memory error |
| Date: | 2009-05-04 20:32:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20090504203258.GI4476@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> How does this look?
>
> Passes my tests, but I can't really reproduce the requirement to retry,
> so I haven't been able to test that part :(
I'm disappointed :-( I thought this thread (without reading it too
deeply) was about fixing the problem that backends sometimes fail to
connect to shmem, on a system that's been running for a while. But I
see that it's about recycling the segment after a crash (and/or
restart?), so it has no relationship to the other case at all :-(
I can't comment on the patch itself.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-05-04 22:10:53 | Re: Unicode string literals versus the world |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-05-04 20:29:48 | Re: windows shared memory error |