From: | Terry Lee Tucker <terry(at)turbocorp(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Two Questions Re: Warm Backup |
Date: | 2009-05-02 21:15:09 |
Message-ID: | 200905021715.09600.terry@turbocorp.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Saturday 02 May 2009 13:08, Daniel Verite wrote:
> Terry Lee Tucker writes
>
> > Q1: Can we set up a scenario where there is more that one
> > warm standby?
>
> Yes. But you'll have to consider what you want to happen when one
> standby is correctly receiving the WAL files and another is not,
> because the archive_command has to either fail or succeed, it can't
> return "half-done".
> You may need to provide your own layer that retry pushing local copies
> of WAL files to the remote nodes and deleting them only when they've
> been received by every standby server.
>
> > Q2: Am I correct in assuming that ALL changes to any of the
> > production schema will be written to the warm standby?
> > For example, if I drop a constraint in production I assume
> > the same will occur on the warm standby. If I create and
> > drop a table in production, I assume it will occur on the warm
> > standby.
>
> It will, all DDL is replicated.
>
> Best regards,
Daniel:
Thanks for the reply. I later read the answer to the first question in the
docs. I expected the answer to number 2 to be affirmative, but just wanted to
make sure.
Thanks for the help...
--
Terry Lee Tucker
Turbo's IT Manager
Turbo, division of OHL
2251 Jesse Jewell Pkwy
Gainesville, GA 30501
tel: (336) 372-6812 cell: (336) 404-6987
terry(at)turbocorp(dot)com
www.turbocorp.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Jones | 2009-05-03 01:07:08 | Re: Re: Mapping output from a SEQUENCE into something non-repeating/colliding but random-looking? |
Previous Message | Mike Christensen | 2009-05-02 18:03:14 | Re: Difference between array column type and separate table |