From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Keyword list sanity check |
Date: | 2009-04-28 19:17:20 |
Message-ID: | 20090428191720.GT1539@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:57:19AM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Greg Stark wrote:
>> I had previously considered adding an assertion in the backend to
>> check they're sorted properly. That would be less formatting
>> dependent and would be only a couple lines of C.
>>
>> I don't think we can do that with the gram.y check though.
>
> Well, the ordering in gram.y is just pro forma anyway. Checking that
> all keywords are present and correctly labeled in kwlist.h is more
> important. What's still missing is to check that all keywords
> defined with "%token <keyword>" in gram.y are present in one of the
> keyword lists.
>
> Hmm, it just occurred to me that this script is only a few steps
> away from actually generating kwlist.h from gram.y, instead of
> merely cross-checking them.
Single Point of Truth is good :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-04-28 19:41:59 | Re: Building Postgresql under Windows question |
Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2009-04-28 19:07:42 | Re: Building Postgresql under Windows question |