| From: | "steven king" <vacuum(at)quantentunnel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net |
| Subject: | Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax |
| Date: | 2009-04-21 20:48:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20090421204813.158820@gmx.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:53:54 -0400
> Von: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> An: steven king <vacuum(at)quantentunnel(dot)de>
> CC: listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> Betreff: Re: [HACKERS] Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax
> Of course if you just want to make a simple tool,
look your (?) idea for range-partitioning ... that solution is (in principle) very close to "my" constraints.
the difference is, that I added the possability to evaluate "logical ranges" (-> values) before deciding the partition to be used.
not more ...
--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2009-04-21 20:51:23 | Re: [ADMIN] License Issue |
| Previous Message | Mikko | 2009-04-21 20:32:18 | Re: trouble with to_char('L') |