| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | marek(dot)patrzek(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Yet another "drop table vs delete" question |
| Date: | 2009-04-21 19:30:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20090421193006.GT10358@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
marek(dot)patrzek(at)gmail(dot)com escribió:
> I was wondering if dropping a table is more efficient in PostgreSQL
> 8.x in comparison to deleting it's content ?
"8.x" is a meaningless version number in Postgres. Major versions (with
new features, etc) are labeled by the first two elements, so 8.0, 8.1,
and so on.
To actually answer your question,
> The thing is, postgresql may leave some invalid content behind in both
> situations. The real question is - which of those two options leaves
> less garbage to be vaccumed ? At this point I don't relay care about
> cost based efficiency but cutting down pg background work.
Try TRUNCATE. That leaves the less garbage behind and takes the less
time.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christophe | 2009-04-21 19:31:23 | Re: Yet another "drop table vs delete" question |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-04-21 19:28:28 | Re: Yet another "drop table vs delete" question |