Re: Yet another "drop table vs delete" question

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: marek(dot)patrzek(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Yet another "drop table vs delete" question
Date: 2009-04-21 19:30:06
Message-ID: 20090421193006.GT10358@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

marek(dot)patrzek(at)gmail(dot)com escribió:
> I was wondering if dropping a table is more efficient in PostgreSQL
> 8.x in comparison to deleting it's content ?

"8.x" is a meaningless version number in Postgres. Major versions (with
new features, etc) are labeled by the first two elements, so 8.0, 8.1,
and so on.

To actually answer your question,

> The thing is, postgresql may leave some invalid content behind in both
> situations. The real question is - which of those two options leaves
> less garbage to be vaccumed ? At this point I don't relay care about
> cost based efficiency but cutting down pg background work.

Try TRUNCATE. That leaves the less garbage behind and takes the less
time.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christophe 2009-04-21 19:31:23 Re: Yet another "drop table vs delete" question
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-04-21 19:28:28 Re: Yet another "drop table vs delete" question