Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df

David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 08:54:10PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > David Fetter wrote:
> >
> > > > > I think it's good to have them translatable. As for using "aggregate"
> > > > > instead of "agg" I don't think it's that great an idea. If you need to
> > > > > notify translators that "agg" stands for "aggregate", add a
> > > > > /* translator: */ comment.
> >
> > The "translator: " comment needs to be in the line just above the
> > string. Right now the PO file looks like this:
> >
> > #: describe.c:243 describe.c:288 describe.c:304
> > msgid "agg"
> > msgstr ""
> >
> > #. translator: "agg" is short for "aggregate"
> > #: describe.c:244
> > msgid "window"
> > msgstr ""
> >
> >
> > Note really what we want ...
>
> Is this any better?

Modified patch applied. I modified the \? display to be two lines:

\df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions
\df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions

and adjusted the code and documentation a bit. I removed the
release.sgml patch because that part will be done when the release notes
are updated and I was worried it might confuse things to add it now.

Thanks, the output looks very good.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +