| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Maria L(dot) Wilson" <Maria(dot)L(dot)Wilson-1(at)nasa(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | "jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Wilson, Maria Louise (LARC-E301)[SCIENCE SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS]" <m(dot)l(dot)wilson(at)nasa(dot)gov>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgres 8.2.9 transaction id wraparound failure |
| Date: | 2009-04-20 18:26:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20090420182602.GE10358@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Maria L. Wilson wrote:
> I was afraid you'd say that - any quick way to vacuum all 315 databases
> on this machine?
Actually you only need to vacuum the database being complained about --
"postgres" in this case. You can issue
SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database ORDER BY age(datfrozenxid) DESC
to find whether any other database is going to need vacuuming as well.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Maria L. Wilson | 2009-04-20 18:30:07 | Re: postgres 8.2.9 transaction id wraparound failure |
| Previous Message | Maria L. Wilson | 2009-04-20 18:15:47 | Re: postgres 8.2.9 transaction id wraparound failure |