From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Patch for 8.5, transformationHook |
Date: | 2009-04-20 14:16:38 |
Message-ID: | 200904201716.38801.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 20 April 2009 09:52:05 Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I don't believe so is possible to find other general solution. (or
> better I didn't find any other solution). Tom has true,
> transformationHook on expression is expensive. I thing, so hook on
> function should be simple and fast - not all transformation's should
> be simple defined via property - classic sample is "decode" like
> functions, it needs procedural code.
I find this all a bit premature, given that you haven't clearly defined what
sort of user-visible functionality you hope to end up implementing. Which
makes it hard to argue why this or that approach might be better.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-20 14:38:02 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Explicitly bind gettext to the correct encoding on Windows. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-20 14:14:01 | Re: [PATCH] unalias of ACL_SELECT_FOR_UPDATE |