From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
Date: | 2009-04-17 21:10:30 |
Message-ID: | 20090417211030.GG10700@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 04:42:31PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
>
> > Is this any better?
>
> So what happens if I do \dfaQ? It should throw an error, yes?
Interesting question.
>
> This help line:
>
> > + fprintf(output, _(" \\df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions. Add a, n, t, w for aggregate, normal, trigger, window\n"));
>
> needs shortening to below 80 chars (or maybe split it in two lines.
> Just make sure they are a single translation item).
>
> It also seems like we're missing tab completion support for this.
This is another interesting question. I notice that the tab
completion doesn't support things like \dit.
Should I add that as a separate patch?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-17 21:27:36 | Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-04-17 20:54:39 | Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings |