Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Date: 2009-04-17 21:10:30
Message-ID: 20090417211030.GG10700@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 04:42:31PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
>
> > Is this any better?
>
> So what happens if I do \dfaQ? It should throw an error, yes?

Interesting question.
>
> This help line:
>
> > + fprintf(output, _(" \\df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions. Add a, n, t, w for aggregate, normal, trigger, window\n"));
>
> needs shortening to below 80 chars (or maybe split it in two lines.
> Just make sure they are a single translation item).
>
> It also seems like we're missing tab completion support for this.

This is another interesting question. I notice that the tab
completion doesn't support things like \dit.

Should I add that as a separate patch?

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-17 21:27:36 Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-04-17 20:54:39 Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings