From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Archives policy |
Date: | 2009-04-16 14:54:59 |
Message-ID: | 200904161454.n3GEsxm27869@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> > Can I get comments/objections/opinions on this draft policy please?
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Archives_Policy
>
> Hmm, the first section suggests that there are cases where we will
> de-archive messages, and then the second lays out all the reasons
> why we won't and why it's useless to ask. So I'm still confused
> what the policy is. I would be happy with a policy that says
> "The archives are graven on stone tablets. Don't bother asking."
> but if we are willing to editorialize in extreme cases then maybe
> the second part needs to be modified.
I didn't say it earlier but I agree with Tom that the text is much too
verbose.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-04-16 15:08:52 | Re: Archives policy |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-04-16 14:46:09 | Re: Archives policy |