Re: Archives policy

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Archives policy
Date: 2009-04-16 14:54:59
Message-ID: 200904161454.n3GEsxm27869@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> > Can I get comments/objections/opinions on this draft policy please?
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Archives_Policy
>
> Hmm, the first section suggests that there are cases where we will
> de-archive messages, and then the second lays out all the reasons
> why we won't and why it's useless to ask. So I'm still confused
> what the policy is. I would be happy with a policy that says
> "The archives are graven on stone tablets. Don't bother asking."
> but if we are willing to editorialize in extreme cases then maybe
> the second part needs to be modified.

I didn't say it earlier but I agree with Tom that the text is much too
verbose.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-04-16 15:08:52 Re: Archives policy
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-04-16 14:46:09 Re: Archives policy