Re: proposal: add columns created and altered to pg_proc and pg_class

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: add columns created and altered to pg_proc and pg_class
Date: 2009-04-14 22:52:24
Message-ID: 200904142252.n3EMqOI09836@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > this my proposal is very simple. It help to people who have to manage
> > large or complex database system. Important data are date of creating
> > and date of altering tables and stored procedures. These data cannot
> > be modified by user, so implementation doesn't need any new
> > statements.
>
> ISTM anyone who thinks they need this actually need a full DDL log;
> or at least, if we give them this, they will be back next week asking
> for a full log. So it'd save a lot of work to tell them to just log
> their DDL to start with.
>
> Some obvious objections to the simple approach:
> - what if I want to know *who* made the change
> - what if I need to know about the change before last
> - what if I need to know about a DROP
> - what if I need to know about operators, operator classes, schemas, etc
> etc

How do you handle dump/restore? Is it preserved?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2009-04-14 23:00:32 Re: Unicode support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-14 22:32:07 Re: Yet another regression issue with Fedora-10 + PG 8.4 beta1