From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt |
Date: | 2009-04-14 13:09:48 |
Message-ID: | 20090414130948.GJ8123@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
* Martin Pitt (mpitt(at)debian(dot)org) wrote:
> For the record, I don't agree. SSL certificate validation is good, and
> should be done as long as you have a cert installed. Encryption
> without authentication is not worth a lot, after all.
I disagree, and you *can* do authentication without SSL! The big one
being Kerberos/GSSAPI which gives both server and client authentication.
There's a big difference between man-in-the-middle attacks and passive
network monitoring. Certainly, we should do validation where it's
*possible* to do it, but I don't think we should throw out encryption
just because we don't have a root cert available for use.
If we don't have a certificate it's not possible to validate *anyone*.
That's going to be the case for packagers and I just can't imagine
asking them to ship a broken configuration.
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-04-14 13:18:34 | Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt |
Previous Message | Martin Pitt | 2009-04-14 07:59:40 | Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt |