| From: | Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: NaN support in NUMERIC data type |
| Date: | 2009-04-09 12:59:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20090409125937.GP12225@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:16:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> writes:
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:11:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Anyway, I revised this a bit and applied to HEAD.
>
> > I've not tested; but your changes look as though they will break:
> > SELECT 'Infinity'::float::numeric;
>
> That gives an error now, just as it did before, so I'm not sure what you
> think is broken about it ...
I shouldn't have responded last night; didn't realise how little of my
code was left so the semantics I was assuming weren't valid.
--
Sam http://samason.me.uk/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2009-04-09 12:59:43 | Strange query plan with redundant aggregate nodes |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-04-09 12:47:46 | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |