Re: psql \d commands and information_schema

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql \d commands and information_schema
Date: 2009-04-08 15:45:19
Message-ID: 20090408154519.GE10285@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane escribió:

> BTW, I hesitate to mention this and perhaps upset a fragile consensus,
> but should we remove the special-case code in \df that tries to hide I/O
> functions by excluding functions that take or return cstring? I think
> that its value has largely disappeared given the new overall behavior.

+1

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Lister 2009-04-08 15:45:24 Re: Array types
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-08 15:43:35 Re: psql \d commands and information_schema