| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
| Subject: | Re: Best replication solution? |
| Date: | 2009-04-07 09:35:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200904071135.54970.dfontaine@hi-media.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Monday 06 April 2009 14:35:30 Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > *SkyTools/Londiste* - Don't know anything special about it.
>
> I've been quite impressed by the usability. It's not quite as
> flexible as Slony, but it has the same theory of operation. The
> documentation is not as voluminous, although it's also much handier as
> reference material than Slony's (which is, in my experience, a little
> hard to navigate if you don't already know the system pretty well).
As a londiste user I find it really trustworthy solution, and very easy to use
and understand. We made some recent efforts on documentation front:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SkyTools
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Londiste_Tutorial
Regards,
--
dim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ivan Voras | 2009-04-07 10:11:00 | Re: Best replication solution? |
| Previous Message | Lists | 2009-04-07 04:07:05 | Re: Best replication solution? |