From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
Date: | 2009-04-05 12:08:41 |
Message-ID: | 20090405120841.GA1513@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 07:55:44AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> If there are no objections, I'm going to remove the following items
> >> from the list at
> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.4_Open_Items
> >>
> >>
> >> change cardinality() for multi-dim arrays?
> >>
> >> Drop; there's no consensus that this should be changed
> >
> > I don't think we should let this go quite so easily, as this is a
> > new function, so the bias should be to "getting it right" rather
> > than "don't change it".
>
> I think it is right already, but the point is debatable.
>
> > The supplied functionality is not only surprising, but easily
> > obtained by an existing function. ISTM if we're supplying a new
> > function it should have new functionality.
>
> Well, it's a compatibility function...
It's actually in SQL:2008.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | abdelhak benmohamed | 2009-04-05 12:53:45 | About hacking postgresql |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-04-05 12:05:13 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |