| From: | Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: reducing IO and memory usage: sending the content of a table to multiple files | 
| Date: | 2009-04-02 16:27:55 | 
| Message-ID: | 20090402162755.GM12225@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 11:20:02AM +0200, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> This is the work-flow I've in mind:
>
> 1a) take out *all* data from a table in chunks (M record for each
> file, one big file?) (\copy??, from inside a scripting language?)
What about using cursors here?
> 2a) process each file with awk to produce N files very similar each
> other (substantially turn them into very simple xml)
> 3a) gzip them
GZIP uses significant CPU time; there are various lighter weight schemes
available that may be better depending on where this data is going.
> 2b) use any scripting language to process and gzip them avoiding a
> bit of disk IO
What disk IO are you trying to save and why?
> Does PostgreSQL offer me any contrib, module, technique... to save
> some IO (and maybe disk space for temporary results?).
> 
> Are there any memory usage implication if I'm doing a:
> pg_query("select a,b,c from verylargetable; --no where clause");
> vs.
> the \copy equivalent
> any way to avoid them?
As far as I understand it will get all the data from the database into
memory first and then your code gets a chance.  For large datasets this
obviously doesn't work well.  CURSORs are you friend here.
-- 
  Sam  http://samason.me.uk/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Crawford | 2009-04-02 16:29:04 | Re: [HACKERS] string_to_array with empty input | 
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-04-02 16:17:21 | Re: [HACKERS] string_to_array with empty input |