From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets |
Date: | 2009-04-01 17:37:56 |
Message-ID: | 20090401173756.GB21229@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:33:26PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Saturday 28 March 2009 00:42:28 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I assume directory permissions controlling access to the socket file
> > would be enough. You are going to have to set up SSL certificates
> > anyway for this so isn't that just as hard as telling the client where
> > the socket file is located?
>
> The permissions on the socket file or the containing directory doesn't tell
> much by itself, because you also need to consider who owns it. What that
> basically comes down to is that the client would need to specify something
> like, "I only want a connection to a server owned by 'postgres'." But the
> client currently has no way of saying that, so we'd need to invent something
> new.
If you're going to get complicated, go the whole way do SO_PEERCRED on
the socket, then you get the UID of the server...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vincze, Tamas | 2009-04-01 18:18:13 | Re: Patch to speed up pg_dump |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-01 17:36:40 | Re: More message encoding woes |