| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: shut down pgsql-interfaces (was Re: [HACKERS] Function C and INOUT parameters) |
| Date: | 2009-03-26 06:24:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200903260824.38777.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 23:55:06 Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> That was 6 months ago. I doubt anyone remembers it. Make another
> >> announcement, so that when people get the "unsubscribed" announcement,
> >> they're not confused.
> >
> > Done.
>
> BTW, what was the reason we didn't pull the trigger before, when we
> retired the other lists? Just an oversight?
Because the same people who complained just now complained back then as well.
So we retired the lists without objections first.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Smet | 2009-03-26 07:32:09 | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-03-26 06:20:58 | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2009-03-27 08:13:33 | Re: [DOCS] the sad state of our FAQs |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2009-03-26 03:43:07 | Re: shut down pgsql-interfaces (was Re: [HACKERS] Function C and INOUT parameters) |