| From: | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is PGSQL enough safe for internet? |
| Date: | 2009-03-18 10:19:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20090318111902.5ae4005a@dawn.webthatworks.it |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:32:56 +0100
durumdara <durumdara(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Possible he can install an another pgsql service that can be
> opened to the net and that can usable for ONLY THIS PROJECT. But I
> don't know, that is possible or not; and how to upgrade later, if
> needed... :-(
If you can't use another DB... or you don't want to use another DB
(this depends on how much separation/security you really think is
suited...) you can configure postgresql to respond just to certain
IP over SSL to access just certain DB even on a different port.
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/auth-pg-hba-conf.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/client-authentication.html
> Can I use some functions in PGSQL to make some protecting rules?
> Like in Mail Servers: if the IP is same and pwd is wrong in X
> times, the IP blocked for N hours...
I wouldn't recommend this approach. Someone may just close you out
from your own home.
Unless you're accessing the server from static IP and you can use
white listing.
--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-03-18 10:33:53 | Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus? |
| Previous Message | Philippe Lang | 2009-03-18 09:55:42 | Query 4-5 times slower after ANALYZE |