From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Jacky Leng <lengjianquan(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Has anybody think about changing BLCKSZ to an option of initdb? |
Date: | 2009-03-14 20:27:03 |
Message-ID: | 20090314202703.GB5624@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> However, at Greenplum I remember determining that larger PG block sizes,
> if matched with larger filesystem block sizes did significantly help on
> performance of data warehouses which do a lot of seq scans -- but that
> our ceiling of 32K was still too small to really make this work. I
> don't have the figures for that, though; Luke reading this?
And did they study the effect of tuning the kernel's readahead?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2009-03-14 20:49:52 | hstore patch, part 1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-14 20:04:36 | Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? |