Re: hstore improvements?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hstore improvements?
Date: 2009-03-13 22:36:49
Message-ID: 20090313223649.GE20676@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Or we could increase the size of hstore values so as to provide more
> than 32 bits total for this, but that would presumably be pessimal for
> all existing applications; there is evidently no one using more than
> 64K, or we'd have heard complaints before.

Would it work to allow storing toast pointers for values?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-03-13 22:53:48 Re: parallel restore item dependencies
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-13 21:47:01 Re: hstore improvements?