Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Mark Wielaard <mjw(at)redhat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package
Date: 2009-03-11 00:08:44
Message-ID: 20090311000844.GJ4406@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> As of CVS HEAD, I see that we got rid of that, and pg_trace.h is now
> >> included only by the .c files that actually need it. ISTM that we
> >> should make 8.3 do likewise.
>
> > Here's a patch for this.
>
> Oh, thanks, I was just about to go off and do that myself, but you
> saved me the trouble. Please commit.

Done.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2009-03-11 01:42:12 Re: Sampling Profler for Postgres
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-03-10 23:53:44 Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)