Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Mark Wielaard <mjw(at)redhat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package
Date: 2009-03-10 23:07:34
Message-ID: 20090310230734.GH4406@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> As of CVS HEAD, I see that we got rid of that, and pg_trace.h is now
> included only by the .c files that actually need it. ISTM that we
> should make 8.3 do likewise.

Here's a patch for this.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

Attachment Content-Type Size
dtrace-83.patch text/x-diff 2.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-03-10 23:49:39 Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-10 22:57:31 Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package